Delcath Systems Announces Publication of Comparative Analysis from Randomized Portion of FOCUS Study in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
The FOCUS study was initially designed and conducted as a randomized controlled trial but was amended to a single-arm design. As a result, comparative efficacy analyses were designated as exploratory. A total of 85 patients were enrolled during the randomized portion of the trial, with 72 receiving study treatment (40 Melphalan/HDS; 32 BAC).
Key Findings from the Randomized Portion of the FOCUS Study:
- All efficacy endpoints of the trial demonstrated substantial and consistent improvements in patients treated with Melphalan/HDS over BAC, including:
- Median progression-free survival in patients treated with Melphalan/HDS was 9.1 months, nearly three times longer than the 3.3 months observed in patients treated with BAC
- Median overall survival was 18.5 months for Melphalan/HDS compared to 14.5 months with BAC
- Objective response rate was 27.5% with Melphalan/HDS, nearly three times higher than 9.4% with BAC
- Disease control rate was 80.0% with Melphalan/HDS, substantially higher than the 46.9% observed with BAC
- Median hepatic progression-free survival was 11.4 months for Melphalan/HDS – more than three times longer than the 3.3 months for BAC
- The safety profile of patients treated with Melphalan/HDS was consistent with prior reports and primarily hematologic in nature. No treatment-related deaths were observed.
“These results further support the use of our hepatic delivery system as a liver-directed treatment option for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma,” said Dr.
The publication is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17231-x
About
In
In
Safe Harbor / Forward-Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by the Company or on its behalf. This press release contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, that can cause actual results to differ materially from those described. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to, uncertainties relating to: the Company’s commercialization plans and its ability to successfully commercialize the HEPZATO KIT; contributions to adjusted EBITDA; the Company’s successful management of the HEPZATO KIT supply chain, including securing adequate supply of critical components necessary to manufacture and assemble the HEPZATO KIT and the managing of any trade restrictions; successful FDA inspections of the facilities of the Company and those of its third-party suppliers/manufacturers; the Company’s successful implementation and management of the HEPZATO KIT Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy; the potential benefits of the HEPZATO KIT as a treatment for patients with primary and metastatic disease in the liver; the Company’s ability to obtain reimbursement for the HEPZATO KIT; and the Company’s ability to successfully enter into any necessary purchase and sale agreements with users of the HEPZATO KIT. For additional information about these factors, and others that may impact the Company, please see the Company’s filings with the
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250409746540/en/
Investor Relations:
ICR Westwicke
investorrelations@delcath.com
Source: